Climate Change Reality Check: Basic Facts that Quickly Prove the Climate Change Crusade is Wrong and Dangerous
| Author | : | |
| Rating | : | 4.98 (570 Votes) |
| Asin | : | 1530535352 |
| Format Type | : | paperback |
| Number of Pages | : | 42 Pages |
| Publish Date | : | 2014-04-22 |
| Language | : | English |
DESCRIPTION:
Hans G. Schantz said Clever, Original Thinking on Climate. This is a short and clever book that raises some fascinating and creative thoughts about climate change in general and climate modeling in particular. Fray observes that the sensitivity of any model limits the conclusions one can draw from it. Drawing on experience with aerodynamic modelling, Fray observes that the amount of temperature change predicted by climate models is much smaller than the apparent sensitivity of the modeling pro. "Interesting perspective" according to John Toomer. I love it when someone uses facts and/or math/science to support a position or statement and this is exactly what you'll find here. I thought this was a very interesting read and enjoyed it very much. I have never thought about the issue of global warming enough to formulate an opinion one way or the other but I am sick of the politicians speaking about it like they are some kind of expert on the subject. I will definitely look at the . "Ranting runs amuck" according to william rabbitt. I agree with his views, but they really don't plow any new ground, nor go into enough detail to make this book anything more than a spirited rant.
What will your response be when you hear others state the indisputable and basic facts presented in this book? “Great publication. In all of the debate and discussion about climate change, why hasn’t anyone explained the science in plain and simple terms clear enough to understand--once and for all? “Great analysis. It is also called the 80/20 rule. What happens when we apply that principle to the global climate change “consensus”? “Thank You! I always thought the numbers were small, but I never took the time to do the math.” -- Mike S. “A very useful contribution to bringing sanity and reason back to the analysis of AGW.&rdq